Jewish group evolutionary strategy
Rough transcript
Some people might say, Those evil Jews, they lie about the Holocaust to steal a piece of land in the Mid East, and to get victim status for themselves, and then they lie about the Arabs to make the U.S.A. fight their enemies.
But guess what?
Jews are not evil, either.
We are just seeing Jewish group evolutionary strategy.
Its ethnographic and understandable.
What would you do if you were two per cent of the population, and you had no army.
This circle represents Jews in the United States, and this circle represents everybody else in the United States.
If this group is totally harmonious with this group, then this group will intermarry and assimilate into this population and lose their identity, which means a diminishing of this Jewish group.
If there’s some bad vibes, however, between these two groups, that keeps assimilation from happening, which is good for Jewish group evolutionary strategy.
Too many bad vibes, though, lead to persecution of Jews, which is bad for the Jewish group.
So how can a small outnumbered group manage this situation by having members of their group rise with precision accuracy to places of power to manage this group?
Here’s an example.
We go to the San Francisco Chronicle on the day Congress gave war powers to George Bush to invade Iraq.
The front page article is written by Edward Epstein, who I’m guessing is Jewish.
He tells us, Congress provided President Bush a solid victory Thursday in his effort to rid Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction, when the House and the Senate voted overwhelmingly to allow the President to use military force against Saddam Hussein’s regime.
We look at the mast head of the paper that day, and see that of the top four people, three are Jewish.
Who reads the San Francisco Chronicle?
This is Congressman Tom Tantos and I represent the Peninsula and San Francisco.
The people who then vote for Tom Lantos.
And Lantos was a leader in the resolution that gave George Bush the power to strike Iraq.
We’ve already seen that Lantos was in a key place just before the 1991 Gulf War, and in 2007, he also was, as head of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, it handles relations of the United States with foreign nations generally, and its list of members evokes the masthead of the San Francisco Chronicle.
From this you’d think the U.S.A. is 35 per cent, Jewish, when it’s actually 2 per cent.
This is Jewish group evolutionary strategy, precision placement.
There’s an even better way to keep this group from assimilating into this group, and to prevent this group from persecuting this group, and still a legend that will work magic in both populations.
Here is the legend.
Once upon a time, a large group, not unlike this group, tried to wipe this group off the face of the earth, and never again will that be allowed to happen.
This legend instills a cohesive identity in this group, and paranoia and anger toward this larger group, while at the same time instilling in this group compassion and sympathy.
The legend largely defines evil for both groups.
This population instinctively believes the legend, in part because it helps them, and in part because they themselves have been lied to.
And this population completely believes the legend due to their gullibility to believe in evil.
Professor Kevin McDonald’s book, Culture of Critique, is the place to learn about Jewish group evolutionary strategy, though he himself publicly states that he is not a holocaust denier.